Engineering Handbook on Rubber Packer Elements

Engineering Handbook on Rubber Packer Elements

Section 1: Materials Science of Packer Elements

Rubber packer elements are critical sealing components in the oilfield services industry, particularly within the completion sector. Their primary function is to provide zonal isolation within the wellbore, containing pressure and controlling fluid movement under a wide array of challenging operational conditions. The successful performance of these elements hinges on a thorough understanding of their materials science, encompassing the selection of appropriate elastomers, their behavior in harsh downhole environments, and the methods used to enhance their inherent properties through formulation. This section provides a deep dive into these aspects, laying the groundwork for effective packer element design and application. The choice of elastomer is a primary determinant of the element’s ability to withstand high temperatures, high pressures (HPHT), and aggressive chemical media such as hydrogen sulfide (H2​S), carbon dioxide (CO2​), completion brines, and various hydrocarbons.¹

1.1. Common Elastomers for Packer Elements

A variety of elastomers are employed in the manufacture of packer elements, each possessing a unique combination of chemical resistance, thermal stability, and mechanical properties. The selection process involves a careful evaluation of these characteristics against the anticipated service conditions. Elastomers, by definition, are high-polymeric, organic networks capable of substantial, reversible deformation, a property that makes them indispensable for creating effective seals.¹ However, the downhole environment, characterized by extreme pressures, elevated temperatures, and corrosive fluids, can severely degrade these materials if not chosen and formulated correctly.¹

Detailed Elastomer Profiles

The following profiles detail the most common elastomers used for packer elements, focusing on their chemical structure, resultant performance implications, typical mechanical properties, operational limits, and relative cost.

Nitrile (NBR – Nitrile Butadiene Rubber)

• Chemical Structure and Its Implications for Performance: NBR is a copolymer of acrylonitrile (ACN) and butadiene.² The ACN content, typically ranging from 18% to 50%, is a critical determinant of its properties. A higher ACN content enhances resistance to nonpolar oils and fuels, which is advantageous in many oilfield applications. However, this increased polarity concurrently reduces low-temperature flexibility and may lead to increased swell in polar solvents.² The butadiene segments contribute to the elastomer’s elasticity but also introduce unsaturation (C=C double bonds) into the polymer backbone. This unsaturation renders NBR susceptible to degradation by ozone, heat, and oxygen, necessitating the incorporation of protective agents like antioxidants and antiozonants in the compound formulation.¹
• Typical Range of Mechanical Properties:
  • Hardness (Shore A): 40–90.³ Packer elements are typically in the 70-90 range.¹
  • Tensile Strength: Approximately 10–25 MPa.³
  • Elongation at Break: Approximately 100–600%.³
  • Compression Set: Fair to good, but highly dependent on the specific formulation, cure system, and operating temperature. Higher temperatures exacerbate compression set.⁶
• Operating Temperature and Pressure Envelopes:
  • Temperature: General service range is -30°C to 120°C.³ For hydrocarbon service in packers, it is often restricted to ≤120∘C due to increased degradation and risk of Rapid Gas Decompression (RGD) damage at higher temperatures.¹ The glass transition temperature (Tg) varies from approximately -55°C to -10°C, increasing with ACN content.⁹
  • Pressure: Suitable for applications with modest gas pressures, typically below 30 MPa, owing to its susceptibility to RGD.¹
• General Cost Comparison: NBR serves as the baseline for cost comparison (Relative Cost Index = 1).¹
• Relevance: NBR is a cost-effective choice for packer elements in moderate-temperature (≤120°C) oil-based fluid environments where extreme gas pressures are not anticipated. Its favorable tensile strength and ease of molding contribute to lower element manufacturing costs.¹

Hydrogenated Nitrile (HNBR)

• Chemical Structure and Its Implications for Performance: HNBR is produced by the selective hydrogenation of the butadiene units in NBR, which significantly reduces the number of C=C double bonds in the polymer backbone.¹¹ This chemical modification results in substantially improved resistance to heat, ozone, H₂S, and amine-based corrosion inhibitors when compared to NBR.¹¹ The oil and fuel resistance, conferred by the ACN groups, is largely retained. The degree of hydrogenation and the original ACN content are key variables that influence the final properties of HNBR.¹³ Peroxide cure systems are commonly employed to optimize HNBR’s performance in HPHT conditions and to enhance its resistance to RGD.¹
• Typical Range of Mechanical Properties:
  • Hardness (Shore A): 70–90.⁸
  • Tensile Strength: Typically 20–38 MPa.¹³
  • Elongation at Break: Approximately 100–500%.¹¹
  • Compression Set: Good to excellent, particularly for peroxide-cured grades, making it suitable for long-term sealing.¹³
  • Abrasion Resistance: Excellent.⁸
• Operating Temperature and Pressure Envelopes:
  • Temperature: Serviceable from -30°C (or -40°C for specialized low-ACN grades) up to 150°C, with certain grades performing reliably up to 160-170°C in continuous service.¹ Tg is typically around -30°C.⁸
  • Pressure: Exhibits good RGD resistance when properly formulated and peroxide-cured, making it suitable for higher gas pressure applications than NBR.¹
• General Cost Comparison: Relative Cost Index: 2–4 times NBR.¹⁷
• Relevance: HNBR is often considered the “go-to” mid-range elastomer for packer elements. It bridges the performance gap between NBR and more expensive fluoroelastomers, offering a good balance of thermal stability, chemical resistance (including sour gas and steam), and mechanical strength for a wide range of downhole conditions.¹

Fluoroelastomers (FKM, e.g., Viton™)

• Chemical Structure and Its Implications for Performance: FKMs are a class of fluorinated synthetic rubbers, typically copolymers or terpolymers. Key monomers include vinylidene fluoride (VDF), hexafluoropropylene (HFP), tetrafluoroethylene (TFE), and perfluoro(methyl vinyl ether) (PMVE).¹⁸ The high fluorine content, generally 66-70% by weight, imparts excellent resistance to high temperatures, hydrocarbon oils, fuels, many solvents, and oxidative environments.¹ Different FKM types (e.g., Type 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, based on ASTM D1418) exist, with variations in monomer composition and fluorine content affecting specific properties like chemical resistance (especially to amines and steam) and low-temperature flexibility.¹⁹ While generally robust, some FKM types can be susceptible to attack by amines, ketones, and hot steam/water.²⁰
• Typical Range of Mechanical Properties:
  • Hardness (Shore A): 60–95.¹
  • Tensile Strength: Approximately 10–20 MPa (can be lower than NBR/HNBR but maintained better at high temperatures).²⁰
  • Elongation at Break: Approximately 100–400%.²⁰
  • Compression Set: Generally good to very good, typically <15-25% at elevated temperatures, crucial for long-term sealing in HPHT wells.²⁰
• Operating Temperature and Pressure Envelopes:
  • Temperature: Continuous service up to 200-225°C.¹ Tg typically ranges from -20°C to 0°C, limiting low-temperature dynamic applications for standard grades, though specialized low-temperature grades are available.⁹
  • Pressure: Good for high-pressure applications due to good mechanical strength at temperature and RGD resistance in properly formulated compounds.¹
• General Cost Comparison: Relative Cost Index: 3–8 times NBR.¹
• Relevance: FKM is the industry’s default choice for high-temperature oil and gas sealing applications. Its broad chemical resistance and thermal stability make it suitable for many HPHT wells, and it often outperforms HNBR in RGD resistance.¹ It is important to recognize that “Viton™” is a trade name for DuPont’s (now Chemours) range of FKMs; other manufacturers produce FKMs under different trade names (e.g., Fluorel™ by 3M/Dyneon, Tecnoflon® by Solvay). While indicative of the general FKM class, specific grades within these product lines can have tailored properties, and reliance on detailed datasheets for the exact grade is essential.

Perfluoroelastomers (FFKM, e.g., Kalrez™)

• Chemical Structure and Its Implications for Performance: FFKM polymers have a fully fluorinated backbone structure, typically composed of monomers like TFE and PMVE, and a cure-site monomer.²³ This results in the highest possible fluorine content (often >71-72.5%) among elastomers.²³ The complete fluorination of the polymer chain provides the ultimate resistance to chemical attack and thermal degradation.
• Typical Range of Mechanical Properties:
  • Hardness (Shore A): 70–95.²⁵
  • Tensile Strength: Typically 15–20 MPa.²⁶
  • Elongation at Break: Approximately 100–250%.²⁶
  • Compression Set: Exceptionally low, often <10-15% even after prolonged exposure to very high temperatures (e.g., 70 hours at 204°C), which is critical for maintaining long-term seal integrity in the most demanding environments.¹
• Operating Temperature and Pressure Envelopes:
  • Temperature: Capable of continuous service at temperatures from 260°C up to 327°C for some specialized grades.¹ Tg is typically around -10°C to 0°C, so low-temperature performance is limited.⁹
  • Pressure: Excellent for ultra-HPHT applications due to retained mechanical properties at extreme temperatures and superior RGD resistance.³¹
• General Cost Comparison: Relative Cost Index: 10–100 times NBR, representing the most expensive class of oilfield elastomers.¹
• Relevance: FFKM is the material of choice for “fit-and-forget” packer elements in the most extreme downhole conditions, such as ultra-HPHT gas wells, geothermal applications, and environments with highly aggressive chemical cocktails or prolonged steam exposure, where seal failure would have catastrophic consequences.¹ “Kalrez™” is DuPont’s (now Chemours) trade name for its FFKM products, and like FKMs, various grades exist tailored to specific service demands (e.g., Kalrez™ 7075 for general chemical and temperature resistance, Kalrez™ 0090 for RGD resistance).²⁵ Other manufacturers include Greene Tweed (Chemraz®) ³² and ERIKS.²⁵

Aflas® (FEPM – Tetrafluoroethylene/Propylene Copolymer)

• Chemical Structure and Its Implications for Performance: Aflas® is a copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) and propylene.¹ Its fluorine content is approximately 54-57%.¹ This unique structure, combining fluorinated and hydrocarbon (propylene) segments, gives FEPM a distinct chemical resistance profile. It exhibits excellent resistance to bases, amines, H₂S, steam, and high pH fluids, where conventional FKMs might show limitations.¹ However, its resistance to aromatic fuels and some chlorinated hydrocarbons can be less than that of certain FKM types.³⁶
• Typical Range of Mechanical Properties:
  • Hardness (Shore A): 60–95.¹
  • Tensile Strength: Approximately 15–22 MPa.¹
  • Elongation at Break: Approximately 100–400%.¹
  • Compression Set: Good, but can be higher than specialized FKMs or FFKMs at very high temperatures.
• Operating Temperature and Pressure Envelopes:
  • Temperature: Continuous service generally up to 200°C, with some grades capable of short-term exposure to 230°C or higher.¹ Tg is typically around -5°C to -10°C.⁹
  • Pressure: Good RGD resistance, making it suitable for HPHT sour service.¹
• General Cost Comparison: Relative Cost Index: 5–10 times NBR.
• Relevance: Aflas® is particularly suited for HPHT sour service applications, especially where exposure to amine-based inhibitors, high pH completion fluids, or steam is prevalent. It is often chosen for frac plugs or liner-top packers that might see both acid treatments and high-chloride brines.¹

Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM)

• Chemical Structure and Its Implications for Performance: EPDM is a terpolymer synthesized from ethylene, propylene, and a small amount of a non-conjugated diene monomer (e.g., ethylidene norbornene (ENB) or dicyclopentadiene (DCPD)).⁴⁰ The diene introduces sites for sulfur vulcanization. The polymer backbone is saturated, which confers excellent resistance to weathering, ozone, steam, hot water, and polar solvents like ketones and alcohols, as well as dilute acids and alkalis.¹ However, EPDM has poor resistance to hydrocarbon oils, fuels, and non-polar solvents.¹
• Typical Range of Mechanical Properties:
  • Hardness (Shore A): 30–90.⁴⁰
  • Tensile Strength: Approximately 5–20 MPa.⁴⁰
  • Elongation at Break: Approximately 100–600%.⁴⁰
  • Compression Set: Good, especially with peroxide cures.⁴²
• Operating Temperature and Pressure Envelopes:
  • Temperature: Serviceable from -50°C up to 140-150°C (peroxide-cured grades can reach higher temperatures, e.g., 177°C for steam).¹ Tg is very low, around -50°C to -60°C, providing excellent low-temperature flexibility.⁹
  • Pressure: Suitable for applications where hydrocarbon exposure is minimal; RGD resistance is not a primary strength.
• General Cost Comparison: Relative Cost Index: 1–1.5 times NBR.¹
• Relevance: EPDM is the preferred choice for packer elements in water-, steam-, or CO₂-dominated completions where oil exposure is negligible. Its excellent low-temperature flexibility is beneficial for operations in cold climates, preventing cold-set issues. It is also used for acidizing jobs due to its good acid resistance.¹

The progression from NBR through HNBR to the various fluoroelastomers (FKM, AFLAS, FFKM) generally reflects an increase in fluorine content (or saturation in the case of HNBR and EPDM). This structural evolution directly correlates with enhanced thermal and chemical stability, particularly in aggressive downhole environments. However, this improvement in performance typically comes with increased material cost and, in some cases, a reduction in low-temperature flexibility (i.e., a higher glass transition temperature). For example, the propylene component in AFLAS, while reducing overall fluorine content compared to some FKMs, imparts its unique resistance to basic and amine-containing environments, demonstrating how specific structural modifications can be targeted for particular performance benefits.¹

It is crucial to understand that while these profiles provide general characteristics for each elastomer type, the actual in-service performance of a packer element is profoundly influenced by the specific compound formulation. Additives such as fillers, plasticizers, cure systems, and protective agents, as discussed later in section 1.4, are used to tailor the properties of the base elastomer. Consequently, two compounds based on the same elastomer type (e.g., FKM) but from different manufacturers or different grades from the same manufacturer can exhibit significant variations in critical properties like compression set, RGD resistance, or specific fluid compatibility.¹ Therefore, reliance on generic elastomer data should be tempered with careful review of specific compound datasheets and, where necessary, bespoke testing for critical applications.

Table 1.1.1: Comparative Properties of Common Packer Elastomers

Note: Properties are typical and can vary significantly with specific compound formulation, cure system, and test conditions. Tg values are approximate. RGD resistance is highly dependent on compound and test conditions.

This table serves as a primary quick-reference guide, enabling engineers to rapidly compare key performance metrics and cost implications. For instance, if an application demands extreme temperature and chemical resistance, FFKM stands out, but its high cost is a significant factor. Conversely, for a lower temperature, oil-rich environment without severe H₂S, NBR might be adequate and highly cost-effective. The table distills information from numerous sources ¹ into a structured format, facilitating an efficient initial screening process.

1.2. Material Selection Criteria for Well Conditions

Selecting the appropriate elastomer for a packer element is a critical engineering decision that directly impacts operational success and well integrity. It is not merely a matter of choosing the material with the highest temperature rating or broadest chemical resistance; rather, it involves a systematic evaluation of all pertinent well conditions against the performance capabilities and cost of available elastomers.¹ The goal is to identify the most cost-effective material that reliably meets or exceeds all minimum performance requirements throughout the intended service life of the packer.

Developing a Decision Framework

A structured decision-making process is essential. This often involves a decision matrix or a set of guidelines that systematically weighs elastomer properties against specific downhole parameters.¹ This framework should prioritize conditions that are most likely to cause failure, such as extreme temperatures, high differential pressures, and aggressive chemical environments.

Temperature Considerations

Temperature is a dominant factor in elastomer selection, influencing both mechanical properties and long-term stability.

• High-Temperature Performance: Each elastomer has a maximum continuous operating temperature beyond which its mechanical properties degrade rapidly, and irreversible chemical changes (thermal degradation) occur.⁴⁶ These limits, detailed in Section 1.1, must be respected, with an appropriate safety margin. Prolonged exposure above these limits leads to hardening, embrittlement, loss of sealing force, and ultimately, failure.
• Low-Temperature Performance and Glass Transition Temperature (Tg): The glass transition temperature (Tg) marks the point below which an elastomer loses its rubbery characteristics and becomes hard and brittle.¹ A packer element operating below its Tg will not be able to conform to the casing or maintain a seal effectively. Typical Tg ranges for common elastomers are provided in Section 1.1. It is crucial to consider the lowest anticipated wellbore temperature, which might occur during well shut-in, fluid circulation, or due to Joule-Thomson cooling effects during gas production or depressurization. Plasticizers can be incorporated into elastomer formulations to lower the Tg and improve low-temperature flexibility, but their potential for extraction by well fluids must be considered.¹
• Thermal Cycling: Fluctuations in wellbore temperature, common during production cycles, shut-ins, or stimulation treatments, can impose significant stress on packer elements. Differential thermal expansion and contraction between the elastomer and the metallic packer components can lead to changes in sealing stress, potentially causing leakage or element damage. Repeated cycling can also accelerate compression set.

Pressure Considerations

While elastomers are nearly incompressible, high downhole pressures create significant challenges, primarily related to extrusion and gas dissolution.

• High-Pressure/High-Temperature (HPHT) Definitions: Industry standards, such as those from API, define HPHT conditions. For example, API Technical Report 1PER15K-1 often refers to pressures greater than 15,000 psi (103 MPa) and temperatures above 350°F (177°C) as HPHT.⁵⁰ However, it’s important to note that many wells may exhibit one extreme (high pressure or high temperature) without the other.⁵⁰ Schlumberger, for instance, has its own HPHT classification system based on component stability limits.⁵⁰
• Extrusion Resistance: Under high differential pressure, the packer element can be forced into any clearance gaps (extrusion gaps) between the packer body and the casing or tubing. This leads to “nibbling” or complete shearing of the element, resulting in seal failure.¹ Extrusion resistance is a function of the elastomer’s hardness (modulus), the size of the extrusion gap, the differential pressure, and temperature (which affects hardness). The use of anti-extrusion backup rings made from harder polymers (like PEEK) or metals is a common and often essential design feature for HPHT packers.¹
• Rapid Gas Decompression (RGD) / Explosive Decompression (ED): This failure mode is particularly critical in gas wells or wells with high gas-oil ratios. It occurs when gas absorbed by the elastomer at high pressure expands rapidly upon sudden depressurization, causing internal ruptures, blistering, and cracking of the element.⁵² Key factors influencing RGD susceptibility include:
• Gas Type: CO₂ and H₂S are generally more aggressive due to their higher solubility and diffusivity in elastomers compared to methane.⁵²
• Pressure and Temperature: Higher pressures lead to more gas absorption, and higher temperatures can affect both gas solubility and the elastomer’s mechanical strength.
• Decompression Rate: Faster depressurization rates allow less time for dissolved gas to permeate out harmlessly, increasing damage risk.⁵²
• Seal Cross-Section: Larger cross-sectional elements are more prone to RGD as gas has a longer diffusion path to escape.⁵²
• Material Properties: Elastomer type, hardness, cure system, and filler type all play a role. Specific grades of HNBR, FKM, FFKM, and AFLAS are formulated for RGD resistance.¹
• Testing Standards: Qualification to standards like NORSOK M-710 Annex B or ISO 23936-2 is often required for critical RGD service.¹ A typical industry benchmark is a passing rating (e.g., 0000/0010, indicating minimal to no internal cracking) after multiple decompression cycles.¹

Chemical Environment Compatibility

The diverse and often aggressive chemical environments encountered downhole necessitate careful elastomer selection to prevent chemical degradation, which can manifest as swelling, hardening, softening, or loss of mechanical integrity.

• Common Downhole Fluids and their Effects:
• H₂S (Sour Gas): Can cause embrittlement, loss of elasticity, and degradation of many elastomers. HNBR, FKM, FFKM, and AFLAS generally offer good to excellent resistance, depending on concentration and temperature.¹
• CO₂: Can cause significant swelling in many elastomers, plasticizing the material and reducing its mechanical strength. This also increases susceptibility to RGD.⁵⁴
• Drilling Muds (Oil-Based Muds – OBM, Water-Based Muds – WBM): OBMs, particularly those with high aromatic content, can cause significant swelling in less resistant elastomers like standard NBR or EPDM. High-ACN NBR, HNBR, FKM, FFKM, and AFLAS generally exhibit better resistance.¹ WBMs are typically less aggressive, but their additives (e.g., surfactants, polymers) can sometimes affect elastomers.
• Completion Brines (NaCl, KCl, CaCl₂, CaBr₂, ZnBr₂): Most oilfield elastomers are generally compatible with standard brines. However, high-density brines (e.g., those containing zinc bromide or calcium bromide) can be aggressive, especially at elevated temperatures, potentially causing hardening or degradation. AFLAS is noted for good resistance to high-density Zn/Br brines.¹ Some elastomers can exhibit swelling in certain brine solutions.⁶³
• Production Hydrocarbons (Crude Oil, Condensate, Natural Gas): The aromatic content of crude oil significantly influences swelling. NBR, HNBR, FKM, FFKM, and AFLAS generally offer good resistance. EPDM has poor resistance to hydrocarbons.¹
• Acids (HCl, HF used in stimulation): FKM, FFKM, and AFLAS typically show good resistance to acids. EPDM can also be used for acid stimulation jobs due to its resistance to these polar fluids.¹
• Amines (Corrosion inhibitors, H₂S scavengers): Can be very aggressive towards standard FKM types, causing excessive swelling or degradation. AFLAS and specialized FFKM grades are often selected for their superior amine resistance.¹
• Compatibility Testing and Data: While general compatibility charts (e.g.⁶⁵) provide initial guidance, the complex mixture of chemicals and additives present in actual wellbore fluids means that testing with field-specific fluids (or qualified surrogates) at service temperature and pressure is highly recommended for critical applications.¹ The interaction of multiple chemicals can lead to synergistic effects not predictable from individual component data.

Wellbore Geometry

The physical dimensions and condition of the wellbore also influence material selection and element design.

• Casing Size and Condition: Larger casing IDs may necessitate packer elements with greater radial expansion capability or specifically designed multi-component elements. The condition of the casing (e.g., roughness, scale, perforations) can cause abrasion or damage to the element during run-in or setting, favoring tougher, more abrasion-resistant compounds.¹
• Extrusion Gap: The radial clearance between the packer mandrel OD and the casing ID is a critical design parameter. This gap must be minimized to prevent extrusion. Material hardness selection is directly linked to the extrusion gap; harder materials are required for larger gaps or higher differential pressures.¹

The selection process must consider the entire operational lifecycle of the packer. A material that performs well at peak production temperature might become too brittle during a cold frac operation, or may not withstand the rapid depressurization during a well control event. Thus, the elastomer must be robust across the full spectrum of anticipated conditions, from deployment through setting, operation, potential interventions, and retrieval (if applicable). Furthermore, the “cost” of an elastomer extends beyond its initial purchase price. The total cost of ownership, which includes the financial and operational ramifications of a premature packer element failure (e.g., lost production, workover costs), must be considered. In critical wells, a more expensive but highly reliable FFKM element might ultimately be more cost-effective than a cheaper alternative that fails early, leading to significant non-productive time (NPT).¹ Industry standards like NORSOK M-710 and ISO 23936 provide valuable qualification frameworks for elastomers in oilfield environments.²¹ However, these standards define specific test conditions (e.g., particular H₂S concentrations, gas mixtures for RGD). Extrapolating performance to well conditions that deviate significantly from these standards requires careful engineering assessment and may necessitate additional, customized testing to ensure reliability.

Table 1.2.1: Elastomer Selection Matrix for Well Conditions

This matrix provides general guidance. Specific grade selection and compound testing are crucial for critical applications. Ratings are relative and depend on specific fluid compositions, concentrations, temperatures, and pressures.

This matrix serves as an initial screening tool. For example, for a well with high H₂S and temperatures around 160°C, HNBR, FKM, AFLAS, or FFKM would be shortlisted, while NBR and EPDM would likely be excluded. Subsequent evaluation would then focus on the specific chemical cocktail, pressure requirements (especially RGD), and cost constraints to narrow down the optimal choice from the shortlisted materials.

1.3. Behavior of Elastomers in Well Conditions

The downhole environment subjects packer elements to a complex interplay of physical and chemical stresses. Understanding how elastomers respond to these conditions—including fluid-induced swell or shrinkage, changes in mechanical properties at operational temperatures and pressures, and resistance to specialized failure modes like RGD—is essential for predicting their performance and ensuring long-term sealing integrity.

Swell and Shrinkage in Various Fluids

When an elastomer is exposed to wellbore fluids, molecules from the fluid can diffuse into the polymer matrix, causing it to swell. Conversely, certain components of the elastomer formulation, such as plasticizers, can be extracted by the fluid, leading to shrinkage.¹ Both phenomena can significantly impact the element’s dimensions, mechanical properties, and sealing force.

• Mechanisms: Fluid absorption is driven by the principle of “like dissolves like”; polar elastomers tend to swell in polar fluids, and non-polar elastomers in non-polar fluids.¹ The rate and extent of swelling depend on the chemical affinity between the elastomer and the fluid, the molecular size of the diffusing species, temperature (which increases diffusion rates), pressure, and the crosslink density of the elastomer (higher crosslink density restricts swelling).⁶¹
• Impact of Swelling: Moderate swelling can sometimes be beneficial, increasing the sealing force. However, excessive swelling can lead to:
  • Reduction in mechanical properties: Hardness, modulus, and tensile strength typically decrease with increased swell.⁶³
  • Increased susceptibility to extrusion due to softening.
  • Difficulty in retrieving packers if the element swells too much to pass restrictions.
  • Potential for the element to overstress and damage itself or the packer body if confined.
• Specific Fluid Effects:
• Drilling Muds: Oil-based muds (OBM) can cause significant swelling in NBR and EPDM. HNBR, FKM, AFLAS, and FFKM generally show good resistance.¹ Water-based muds (WBM) are less aggressive, but additives can cause issues.
• Completion Brines: While many elastomers are compatible with NaCl and KCl brines, high-density brines (CaCl₂, CaBr₂, ZnBr₂) can be aggressive at high temperatures. AFLAS is noted for good resistance to ZnBr₂ brines.¹ Some elastomers can swell in water-based brines due to osmotic effects or absorption by hydrophilic fillers.⁶³
• Hydrocarbons: The aromatic content of crude oils and condensates is a key factor; higher aromatics lead to greater swell in less resistant materials. EPDM is particularly poor in hydrocarbons.¹
• CO₂: Carbon dioxide is known to cause significant swelling in many elastomers, even at relatively low concentrations in gas or supercritical phases. This swelling can plasticize the material, reducing its strength and increasing its permeability, which also exacerbates RGD risk.⁵⁴
• Shrinkage: Extraction of plasticizers or other low-molecular-weight compounding ingredients by wellbore fluids can lead to a reduction in the element’s volume (shrinkage), resulting in hardening and potential loss of sealing contact.¹

The kinetics of fluid absorption, or how quickly an elastomer swells, can be as critical as the total equilibrium swell. Rapid swelling might cause an element to seal prematurely during run-in or lead to unexpected stress build-up if clearances change quickly. This aspect is governed by the diffusion coefficients of the fluid molecules within the elastomer matrix, which are temperature-dependent.⁶³

Changes in Mechanical Properties at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures

• Temperature Effects: Elevated temperatures generally cause a reversible reduction in an elastomer’s modulus, tensile strength, and tear strength, while increasing its elongation at break and susceptibility to compression set.¹ If the temperature exceeds the material’s thermal stability limit, irreversible chemical degradation occurs, leading to permanent loss of properties (see Section 1.3 on Thermal Degradation).
• Pressure Effects: Hydrostatic pressure itself typically has a minor direct effect on the bulk mechanical properties of elastomers because they are nearly incompressible. However, pressure is the driving force for extrusion and is a key parameter in RGD phenomena. High pressure can also influence chemical reaction rates and fluid phase behavior, indirectly affecting the elastomer.
• Combined HPHT Effects: The simultaneous action of high pressure and high temperature can have synergistic effects. For example, high temperature softens the elastomer, making it more prone to extrusion under high differential pressure. Chemical degradation rates are also accelerated at high temperatures, and these reactions can be further influenced by pressure. Constitutive material models, such as the Mooney-Rivlin model for hyperelastic behavior or the Generalized Maxwell model for viscoelastic behavior, are used in Finite Element Analysis (FEA) to predict element performance under these combined conditions, often requiring material characterization at relevant temperatures.¹

Resistance to Explosive Decompression (ED) / Rapid Gas Decompression (RGD)

As previously introduced, RGD is a major failure mechanism for elastomer seals in high-pressure gas service.

• Mechanism: Gas (e.g., methane, CO₂, H₂S) dissolves into the elastomer matrix under high system pressure. When the external pressure is rapidly reduced, the dissolved gas attempts to escape. If the depressurization rate is faster than the rate at which gas can diffuse out of the elastomer, the gas expands internally, forming bubbles or voids. These internal pressures can exceed the elastomer’s tear strength, leading to blisters, cracks, and catastrophic seal failure.⁵²
• Influencing Factors:
  • Material Type and Formulation: The inherent gas permeability, modulus, tear strength, and fracture toughness of the elastomer are critical. Harder compounds and those with specific fillers or cure systems (e.g., peroxide-cured HNBR, specialized FKMs, FFKMs, AFLAS) generally exhibit better RGD resistance.¹
  • Gas Properties: Gases with higher solubility and diffusivity in the elastomer (e.g., CO₂, H₂S) pose a greater RGD risk than less soluble gases like methane.⁵² Gas mixtures can have complex effects.
  • Operating Conditions: Higher saturation pressure, higher temperature (which can increase permeability but decrease strength), and faster decompression rates all increase the severity of RGD.⁵²
  • Seal Geometry: Larger cross-sectional seals are more susceptible because the diffusion path for gas to escape is longer, leading to higher internal pressure build-up.⁵²
  • Visual Characteristics: RGD damage is typically characterized by internal voids (giving a spongy appearance when the element is cut open), surface blisters, and deep cracks that often appear to originate from within the bulk of the material.⁵²
  • Testing and Qualification: Standards such as NORSOK M-710 Annex B and ISO 23936-2 define procedures for RGD testing. These typically involve saturating elastomer samples with a specific gas (or gas mixture) at high pressure and temperature, followed by rapid depressurization cycles. Post-test visual inspection and rating systems (e.g., rating 0000 for no damage) are used to qualify materials.¹

The presence of multiple gases in the downhole environment, such as a mixture of CO₂, H₂S, and methane, can lead to complex interactions regarding RGD susceptibility and chemical degradation. The combined effect may not be simply additive or predictable from single-gas exposure data. For instance, the swelling caused by CO₂ might increase the permeability of the elastomer to H₂S, potentially accelerating H₂S-induced degradation. This highlights the importance of testing elastomers in fluid mixtures that are representative of the actual service environment whenever possible.

Stress Relaxation and Creep

Elastomers are viscoelastic materials, meaning they exhibit both elastic (spring-like) and viscous (fluid-like) behavior.¹

• Stress Relaxation: When an elastomer is held at a constant deformation (strain), the internal stress required to maintain that deformation gradually decreases over time. This is stress relaxation.¹ For a packer element, this means the initial contact stress generated against the casing during setting will diminish over time, especially at elevated temperatures.
• Creep: When an elastomer is subjected to a constant stress (load), its deformation gradually increases over time. This is creep.¹
• Impact on Sealing: Both stress relaxation and creep can lead to a reduction in the long-term sealing force of the packer element. If the sealing force drops below a critical level, leakage can occur. This is particularly relevant for permanent packers or those expected to seal for extended durations under HPHT conditions.
• Compression Set: Compression set is a common measure of the permanent deformation remaining after a material has been subjected to compressive stress for a period, typically at elevated temperature.¹ It is a direct consequence of stress relaxation and irreversible chemical changes (like continued crosslinking or degradation) within the elastomer network. Materials with low compression set values are preferred for long-term sealing applications as they better maintain their sealing force.
• Influencing Factors: Temperature is the most significant accelerator of stress relaxation and creep. Elastomer type, crosslink density and type (e.g., peroxide cures often yield lower compression set), and the magnitude of the applied stress/strain also play crucial roles.

Predicting long-term sealability requires an understanding of stress relaxation behavior at relevant downhole temperatures. While basic mechanical properties are commonly reported, comprehensive stress relaxation data is less available but is critical for designing reliable long-life seals. High stress relaxation invariably leads to high compression set and an increased likelihood of eventual leakage, representing a slow failure mechanism that might not be identified by short-term qualification tests.

1.4. Formulation and Property Enhancement

Raw elastomers, while possessing inherent rubbery characteristics, seldom exhibit the optimal combination of mechanical strength, thermal stability, chemical resistance, and processability required for demanding downhole packer element applications. Elastomer compounding is the science and art of blending these base polymers with a variety of additives to tailor their properties for specific performance targets and manufacturing processes.¹ Each ingredient plays a specific role in modifying the final vulcanizate.

Fillers and Their Impact

Fillers are particulate materials incorporated into the elastomer matrix primarily to enhance mechanical properties (reinforcement) and/or reduce cost.

• Carbon Black:
  • Types and Reinforcement: Carbon black is the most widely used reinforcing filler for elastomers. Various grades exist, classified by manufacturing process (e.g., furnace, thermal) and key characteristics like particle size, structure (complexity of aggregated particles, often indicated by DBP absorption), and surface activity.¹ Common grades include N330 (HAF – High Abrasion Furnace), N550 (FEF – Fast Extrusion Furnace), N770 (SRF – Semi-Reinforcing Furnace), and N990 (MT – Medium Thermal).¹ Generally, smaller particle sizes and higher structure levels lead to greater reinforcement, resulting in increased hardness, modulus, tensile strength, tear resistance, and abrasion resistance.¹
  • Impact on Processing and Cure: Carbon black significantly affects compound viscosity, extrusion characteristics, and scorch time (premature vulcanization). Some furnace blacks, being slightly basic, can act as activators in sulfur cure systems and may promote the formation of more thermally stable mono- and disulfidic crosslinks.¹
• Silica (Precipitated and Fumed):
  • Reinforcement and Properties: White reinforcing filler that can provide reinforcement levels comparable to carbon black, particularly useful for non-black compounds or when specific properties like low hysteresis (heat buildup) are desired.¹ Fumed silicas generally offer higher reinforcement than precipitated silicas due to finer particle size and higher surface area but are more expensive.
  • Challenges and Solutions: Silica is hydrophilic and has a strong tendency to form agglomerates (filler-filler interaction) due to hydrogen bonding between surface silanol (Si-OH) groups. This can make dispersion difficult and lead to high compound viscosity.¹ The acidic nature of silanol groups can also interfere with basic accelerators in sulfur cure systems by adsorbing them, thereby slowing down vulcanization.¹ To overcome these issues and improve polymer-filler interaction, coupling agents, typically organosilanes (e.g., TESPT, TESPD), are used. These bifunctional molecules react with the silica surface and co-vulcanize with the polymer, leading to improved reinforcement, better processing, and reduced hysteresis.¹
  • Impact on Vulcanizate Properties: Can improve tear strength, hot air resistance, and reduce rolling resistance in tire applications (often termed “green tire” technology when used with silanes).¹
  • Other Fillers: Non-reinforcing or semi-reinforcing fillers like clays (kaolin), calcium carbonate (whiting), and talc are sometimes used, primarily to reduce compound cost, improve processability, or impart specific properties such as increased electrical resistivity or flame retardancy (e.g., aluminum trihydrate).¹

Plasticizers

• Function: Plasticizers are typically liquids added to rubber compounds to increase flexibility, improve low-temperature performance (by lowering the Tg), reduce hardness, and aid in processing by lowering compound viscosity and facilitating filler dispersion.¹
• Types: Common types include ester-based plasticizers (e.g., phthalates, adipates, sebacates), and mineral oils (paraffinic, naphthenic, aromatic). The choice depends on compatibility with the base elastomer to prevent migration (bleeding out) or extraction by service fluids.¹ For example, aromatic oils are used with SBR, while paraffinic or naphthenic oils are more common with EPDM or NBR.
• Considerations for Packer Elements: The use of plasticizers in packer elements must be carefully considered. While they can improve low-temperature sealability, they are susceptible to extraction by downhole fluids (oils, solvents), which can lead to element shrinkage, hardening, and a reduction in sealing effectiveness over time.¹ For HPHT applications, if plasticizers are used, they must be of very low volatility and highly resistant to extraction.

Cure Systems (Vulcanization)

Vulcanization is the process of forming a three-dimensional crosslinked network within the elastomer, transforming it from a soft, tacky, and deformable material into a strong, elastic, and dimensionally stable product capable of performing as a seal.¹ The choice of cure system is critical as it dictates the type and density of crosslinks, which in turn profoundly affects the vulcanizate’s mechanical properties, thermal stability, compression set, and chemical resistance.

• Sulfur Cure Systems:
  • Components: Elemental sulfur is the primary crosslinking agent. Accelerators (organic compounds that increase the rate and efficiency of vulcanization, e.g., thiazoles like MBTS, sulfenamides like CBS, thiurams like TMTD, and guanidines like DPG) and activators (typically zinc oxide and stearic acid, which form an activator complex) are essential components.¹
  • Mechanism: The reaction involves the formation of sulfidic crosslinks (C-Sₓ-C) between polymer chains, where ‘x’ can range from one (monosulfidic) to several (polysulfidic).
  • Impact on Properties: Sulfur cures are versatile and cost-effective. The structure of the crosslinks (mono-, di-, or polysulfidic) can be influenced by the sulfur-to-accelerator ratio.
  • Conventional Vulcanization (CV) systems (high sulfur, low accelerator) tend to produce a higher proportion of polysulfidic crosslinks, which provide good tensile and tear strength but have lower thermal stability and are prone to reversion (loss of crosslinks at high temperature).¹
  • Efficient Vulcanization (EV) systems (low sulfur, high accelerator) favor monosulfidic and disulfidic crosslinks, resulting in improved thermal stability, lower compression set, and better aging resistance, though sometimes at the expense of some dynamic properties.¹
  • Semi-EV systems offer a compromise.
  • Suitability: Primarily used for unsaturated elastomers such as NBR, SBR, NR, EPDM (which contains a diene for sulfur curing), and partially for HNBR.¹
• Peroxide Cure Systems:
  • Components: Organic peroxides (e.g., dicumyl peroxide (DCP), 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(tert-butylperoxy)hexane) are used as the crosslinking agents. Coagents (polyfunctional monomers like triallyl cyanurate (TAC) or triallyl isocyanurate (TAIC)) are often added to improve crosslinking efficiency and properties.¹
  • Mechanism: Peroxides decompose at elevated temperatures to generate free radicals. These radicals abstract hydrogen atoms from the polymer chains, creating polymer radicals that then combine to form stable carbon-carbon (C-C) crosslinks.
  • Impact on Properties: C-C crosslinks are generally more thermally stable and have higher bond energy than sulfidic crosslinks. This results in vulcanizates with excellent thermal stability, very low compression set, superior aging resistance, and often better resistance to certain chemicals.¹ Peroxide cures are less prone to reversion. However, they can be sensitive to oxygen during cure (leading to tacky surfaces if not cured under pressure or in steam) and can be retarded or inhibited by certain acidic fillers or antioxidants.¹
  • Suitability: Effective for both saturated elastomers (like EPDM, silicone rubbers) and unsaturated elastomers (like HNBR, FKM, AFLAS).¹ Often the preferred system for HPHT packer elements due to the enhanced thermal stability and compression set resistance.
  • Other Cure Systems: Resin cure systems (e.g., phenolic resins) are used for specific elastomers like Butyl rubber (IIR) to achieve good heat resistance and stable modulus. Metal oxides (e.g., zinc oxide, magnesium oxide) are used to cure halogen-containing elastomers like Chloroprene rubber (CR) and some FKMs.¹

The selection of a cure system is a critical aspect of compounding for HPHT packer elements. Peroxide cures, by virtue of forming robust C-C crosslinks, generally offer superior thermal stability and lower compression set values compared to traditional sulfur cures. These characteristics are paramount for maintaining seal integrity over long durations at elevated temperatures. The weaker C-S and S-S bonds in sulfur-cured networks, especially polysulfidic ones, are more susceptible to thermal scission and rearrangement (reversion), which can lead to a loss of mechanical properties and sealing force.¹ Therefore, peroxide curing is often the default consideration for elastomers like HNBR, FKM, and AFLAS when destined for HPHT service.

Antioxidants and Antiozonants (Protective Agents)

Elastomers, particularly those with unsaturation in their backbone (like NBR), are susceptible to degradation by environmental factors such as oxygen, ozone, and heat, which can be exacerbated by UV light or metal ion catalysis.¹

• Antioxidants:
  • Function: These additives are incorporated to protect the elastomer from oxidative degradation, which can occur during processing, storage, and service. Oxidation can lead to chain scission (resulting in softening and tackiness, common in NR) or further crosslinking (resulting in hardening and embrittlement, common in SBR and NBR).¹
  • Mechanism: Antioxidants function either by scavenging the free radicals that propagate the oxidation chain reaction (chain-breaking antioxidants, e.g., hindered phenols, secondary amines like PPDs) or by decomposing peroxides into non-radical, stable products (preventive antioxidants).¹
  • Types: Common classes include aminic (e.g., p-phenylenediamines (PPDs) like IPPD and 6PPD, diphenylamines), phenolic (e.g., hindered phenols like BHT), and phosphite antioxidants.¹ The choice depends on the elastomer, service temperature, required persistence, and staining characteristics.
• Antiozonants:
  • Function: These are used to protect unsaturated elastomers from attack by atmospheric ozone, which is highly reactive and can cause characteristic surface cracking, especially when the rubber is under strain.¹
  • Mechanism: Antiozonants, typically PPDs, can function by several mechanisms: they can scavenge ozone molecules at the surface, react with the ozonides formed from ozone-polymer reaction to prevent chain scission, or form a protective, impermeable film on the rubber surface.¹ Waxes are also used as antiozonants; they bloom to the surface to form a physical barrier against ozone, but are only effective under static conditions and above their melting point.⁶⁸
  • Relevance to Packers: While direct atmospheric ozone exposure is not a concern for downhole packer elements, many antiozonants, particularly PPDs, also provide significant antioxidant and anti-flex-fatigue protection, contributing to the overall durability and service life of the element, especially in dynamic or thermally challenging conditions.⁶⁸

The interaction between fillers and cure systems is a complex but critical aspect of rubber compounding. For instance, acidic fillers like silica can interfere with basic accelerators used in sulfur cure systems, potentially neutralizing them or adsorbing them onto the high surface area of the filler, thereby reducing their availability for the vulcanization reaction and slowing down the cure rate.¹ This necessitates careful balancing of the formulation, often requiring higher accelerator dosages or the use of specific accelerator types that are less affected by the filler’s surface chemistry. Similarly, some carbon black grades can influence cure rates due to their surface pH.

Example of Formulation Optimization for a Challenging Application: High H₂S, High-Temperature Gas Well Packer Element

Consider the design of a packer element for a gas well characterized by high concentrations of H₂S (e.g., >10%) and high temperatures (e.g., 180°C).

• Base Elastomer Selection: Given the H₂S and temperature, candidates would include AFLAS (FEPM) for its excellent H₂S and amine resistance, specific grades of FKM known for good sour service performance, or high-end FFKM if ultimate reliability is paramount and cost allows.¹ A highly saturated, peroxide-cured HNBR might be considered if conditions are at the lower end of “high H₂S/high temperature.”
• Filler System: A reinforcing carbon black, such as N330 (HAF) or N550 (FEF), would be chosen to provide good mechanical properties. It’s important to select a grade with low sulfur content to minimize any potential reactions with H₂S at elevated temperatures. Silica might be avoided or used cautiously with an appropriate silane coupling agent, due to potential acidity issues and interactions with some cure systems, unless specific benefits like tear strength enhancement are critically needed.
• Plasticizer: For a high-temperature application, plasticizers would generally be minimized or avoided to prevent extraction and maintain thermal stability. If required for very specific processing or marginal low-temperature needs (unlikely in this scenario), a very stable, low-volatility, and highly compatible type would be essential.
• Cure System: A peroxide cure system would be the preferred choice. This creates thermally stable C-C crosslinks, which are inherently more resistant to H₂S attack and thermal degradation compared to most sulfidic crosslinks.¹ An appropriate coagent (e.g., TAIC) would be included to ensure efficient crosslinking and achieve optimal network structure.
• Protective Agents: A high-temperature stable antioxidant, possibly a polymeric hindered phenol or a specific amine-type antioxidant known for its effectiveness in sour environments, would be incorporated. Given the saturated or highly fluorinated nature of the chosen base elastomers, ozone resistance is inherently good, but the antioxidant package will contribute to overall oxidative stability.
• Rationale for Choices: The formulation strategy aims to maximize thermal stability (via peroxide cure and a thermally robust elastomer), enhance H₂S resistance (by selecting a highly saturated or fluorinated polymer and forming C-C crosslinks), and ensure mechanical integrity (through reinforcing carbon black). Components that could potentially react with H₂S (like elemental sulfur in the cure system) or degrade significantly at 180°C are avoided or minimized.

It is evident that “property enhancement” through compounding is invariably a process of balancing competing requirements and managing trade-offs. For instance, increasing the loading of reinforcing carbon black generally boosts hardness, modulus, and extrusion resistance—all desirable for high-pressure packer elements. However, this typically comes at the cost of reduced elongation at break, increased compound viscosity (making processing more difficult), and potentially higher hysteresis (heat buildup under dynamic conditions).¹ Similarly, adding a plasticizer can improve low-temperature flexibility and processability but may compromise ultimate strength, increase swell in certain fluids, and reduce high-temperature stability due to volatilization or extraction.¹ The skill of the rubber compounder lies in judiciously selecting and proportioning ingredients to achieve the optimal balance of properties demanded by the specific packer application and its service environment.

Table 1.4.1: Influence of Key Compounding Ingredients on Packer Element Performance

This table helps engineers understand how different additives modify base elastomer properties, enabling better interpretation of material datasheets and appreciating the formulation strategies behind high-performance packer elements. For example, if comparing two HNBR compounds, differences in their filler systems (e.g., type/loading of carbon black or presence of silica) or cure systems (peroxide vs. sulfur) will explain variations in hardness, thermal stability, or compression set.¹

Section 2: Applications and Design Considerations for Packer Elements

Having established the materials science foundation, this section transitions to the practical application of rubber elements within various types of downhole packers. The design of the rubber element is not a standalone exercise; it is intrinsically linked to the packer’s overall construction, its intended setting mechanism, and the specific operational demands it will face. The primary function of any packer is to create a reliable hydraulic seal in the annulus between the tubing and casing (or open hole), thereby isolating zones for production, injection, or treatment.⁷¹ The rubber element is the heart of this sealing system, and its geometry must be optimized to effectively convert an applied setting force—whether mechanical, hydraulic, or otherwise—into a sustained sealing pressure against the wellbore wall.¹

2.1. Packer Setting Mechanisms and Rubber Element Design

Different packer types utilize distinct mechanisms to energize their sealing elements. These mechanisms impose unique requirements on the rubber element’s design, material properties, and interaction with adjacent metallic components.

Permanent Packers:

• Role and Design: Permanent packers are designed for long-term, often life-of-well, zonal isolation, typically in demanding HPHT environments.¹ The rubber element in a permanent packer must provide an exceptionally durable and reliable seal, capable of withstanding high differential pressures and temperatures for extended periods without significant degradation, creep, or loss of sealing force. Consequently, element designs for permanent packers prioritize maximum sealing integrity and long-term material stability. They frequently incorporate robust anti-extrusion systems, often made of metal or high-strength polymers like PEEK, which are closely integrated with the rubber element(s) to prevent extrusion into the clearance gap under high pressure.⁷² The element configuration might involve single or multiple rubber components, sometimes with varying hardness, to optimize load distribution and sealing.
• Setting Mechanism: Permanent packers are typically set using hydraulic pressure (applied through the tubing or a dedicated control line) or by means of a wireline or tubing-conveyed setting tool that generates a significant axial compressive force on the element stack.⁷⁴ The rubber element must be capable of undergoing substantial compression to achieve the required radial expansion and high contact stress against the casing, without sustaining damage during the setting process.
• Material Considerations: Due to the stringent demands for long-term thermal and chemical stability, permanent packers in HPHT wells often utilize high-performance elastomers such as FKM, FFKM, or AFLAS.¹ The selection is driven by the need to minimize compression set and stress relaxation over many years of service.

Hydraulic-Set Packers:

• Role and Design: These packers are energized by applying hydraulic pressure (typically from the tubing string or annulus) to a piston integrated within the packer body. This piston then exerts an axial compressive force on the rubber sealing element, causing it to expand radially and seal against the casing.⁷⁶ The element’s geometry—including its length, thickness, end angles, and any surface features like grooves or ribs—must be carefully designed to translate this hydraulic force efficiently into a uniform and effective sealing contact pressure.¹ Grooves can help control the deformation pattern, accommodate debris, and enhance sealing in some cases.
• Setting Pressure and Element Geometry: The required hydraulic setting pressure is a function of the element’s material properties (modulus), its geometry, the radial gap to be sealed, and the desired contact stress.¹ Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is often used to optimize element geometry to achieve the target seal with minimum setting pressure and to manage internal stresses within the rubber.²¹
• Specific Considerations: Hydraulic-set packers must be designed to prevent premature setting due to hydrostatic pressure during run-in.⁷⁵ The element must also be protected from damage caused by fluid flow (swabbing) as it is run into the well.

Mechanical-Set Packers:

• Role and Design: Mechanical-set packers are actuated by manipulating the tubing string, such as applying rotation, tension, or compression.¹ This manipulation engages a mechanical system (e.g., J-slots, threaded components, drag blocks) that applies compressive force to the rubber element. The element must be robust enough to withstand these, sometimes complex, setting forces, which can include torsional stresses in addition to axial compression.
• Protection During Run-in: The rubber elements are often shielded by metallic cones or sleeves during deployment to prevent damage and premature setting. These protective components are retracted or shifted during the setting sequence to allow the element to be compressed.⁸³
• Element Engagement and Deformation: The design must ensure that the element engages correctly with the setting cones or pressure rings to achieve uniform compression and radial expansion. The material’s modulus and the element’s profile are critical to ensure it deforms predictably under the applied mechanical load.

Retrievable Packers:

• Role and Design: Retrievable packers are designed to be set securely, provide zonal isolation for a period, and then be unset and retrieved from the well, often for reuse or to allow further well operations.¹ The paramount design challenge for the rubber element in a retrievable packer is achieving a delicate balance: it must create a robust, reliable seal when set, yet be able_to_relax sufficiently to allow for easy and damage-free retrieval.
• Element Relaxation and Retrieval: The elastomer selected must exhibit excellent elastic recovery (often referred to as “memory”) to retract from the casing wall when the unsetting force is applied. High compression set, excessive permanent deformation, or significant fluid-induced swelling can impede this relaxation, making the packer difficult or impossible to retrieve without damaging the element or requiring excessive force, potentially leading to costly fishing operations.⁸⁶
• Durability and Anti-Extrusion: Retrievable packers, especially those intended for multiple setting operations or use in HPHT conditions, often incorporate anti-extrusion features. The element material may also need to be more resistant to abrasion and wear if it is to withstand repeated setting and unsetting cycles.

Wireline-Set Packers:

• Role and Design: These packers are deployed and set using electric wireline, slickline, or coiled tubing.¹ The setting force is typically generated by an electrically initiated explosive charge, a pyrotechnic gas generator, or an electro-hydraulic mechanism within a setting tool. These forces are generally lower and applied more rapidly than those in hydraulically or mechanically set tubing packers.
• Specific Challenges: The limited setting force available from wireline tools means that the rubber elements may need to be made from softer (lower durometer) elastomers or have profiles (e.g., thinner walls, specific tapers) that require less force to energize and achieve an effective seal. Protection of the element during deployment through potentially deviated, restricted, or rough wellbores is critical, as wireline deployment offers less control than tubing-conveyed methods.⁸⁷ Slim-line designs are often a feature of wireline-set packers to facilitate passage through wellbore restrictions.⁸⁷

Dissolvable Packers (and Frac Plugs):

• Role and Design: Dissolvable packers and frac plugs utilize rubber elements to provide temporary zonal isolation, typically for multi-stage hydraulic fracturing operations. The key feature is that the main structural components of the packer (often made from magnesium alloys, specialized aluminum alloys, or degradable polymers like polylactic acid (PLA) or polyglycolic acid (PGA)) are designed to dissolve in wellbore fluids over time or with specific triggers, eliminating the need for mechanical removal.¹
• Sealing and Dissolution Sequence: The rubber element must establish and maintain a hydraulic seal for the required operational duration (e.g., during fracturing stages). Its design must ensure that it does not interfere with the dissolution process of the packer body. Typically, the rubber element itself is not designed to be fully dissolvable at the same rate as the metallic or polymeric body. After the structural components dissolve, the rubber element is either broken into smaller, non-obstructive pieces that can be flowed back or pushed to a sump, or it may be designed to be easily pushed out of the way by production flow.
• Material Compatibility and Interaction: The elastomer used must be compatible with the wellbore fluids that are intended to trigger the dissolution of the packer body, as well as with any byproducts of the dissolution process. It must not degrade prematurely or swell excessively in a manner that could block fluid access to the dissolvable components, thereby hindering or slowing the dissolution.⁸⁸ The trend towards longer laterals and higher stage density in unconventional wells ⁸⁹ drives the demand for reliable dissolvable technology to reduce intervention time and costs.

A critical consideration across all packer types is the synergistic interaction between the rubber element and the packer’s metallic components (mandrel, end rings, anti-extrusion system, setting sleeves/cones). The packer’s performance is not solely dependent on a high-quality rubber element; it relies on the integrated design where metal parts properly confine, support, and energize the elastomer.¹ For instance, a relatively soft elastomer might conform well to casing irregularities but will readily extrude under pressure without robust metallic backup rings. Conversely, a very hard elastomer might resist extrusion but could fail to achieve an effective seal if the setting mechanism cannot apply sufficient force or if the end rings do not adequately control its deformation. This necessitates a holistic design approach where the element and its surrounding hardware are engineered as a system.

For retrievable packers, the “unset” mechanism and the element’s capacity to fully relax are as vital as its setting performance.⁸⁵ An element that experiences excessive compression set, swells considerably due to fluid absorption, or is damaged during the setting process can make the packer extremely difficult or even impossible to retrieve. This can lead to expensive and time-consuming fishing operations, negating the primary advantage of a retrievable system. Thus, factors like material resilience, low compression set, and controlled swell are paramount for the rubber elements in these tools.

The ongoing evolution of well construction, particularly the increasing prevalence of extended-reach horizontal wells and multi-stage completions ⁸⁹, places escalating demands on all packer types. These operational realities drive the need for packer elements that can be run in faster, set reliably in highly deviated or complex wellbores, and often fit within more compact tool designs. This, in turn, influences element design towards more efficient profiles, materials that can withstand harsher deployment conditions (e.g., abrasion, impact), and setting mechanisms that are less sensitive to wellbore orientation or conditions.

2.2. Unique Factors for Each Application (Comparative Table)

To further clarify the distinct requirements placed upon rubber elements by different packer applications, the following table provides a comparative overview. This synthesis highlights how the intended use and operational context of the packer dictate the critical performance attributes for its sealing element.

Table 2.2.1: Rubber Element Design Considerations for Various Packer Types

This table provides a general comparison. Specific design choices depend on the detailed operational requirements and well conditions.

The “expected service life” is a significant differentiator in material selection. For permanent packers, the elastomer must resist degradation and maintain sealing force for many years, often pushing material choices towards the most stable options like FFKM, even at a premium cost. In contrast, dissolvable frac plugs have a very short operational life, measured in hours or days, allowing for a broader range of potentially lower-cost elastomers, provided they meet the short-term sealing and compatibility requirements.¹

The design of anti-extrusion systems is not merely about preventing the bulk movement of the rubber element into the clearance gap. It is also crucial for managing stress concentrations at the element’s shoulders and protecting it from “nibbling” or localized shear damage at the extrusion gap interface.¹ The material (e.g., PEEK, various metals, composites) and geometry (e.g., profiled, interlocking) of the backup rings are therefore critical components of the overall sealing system, especially in HPHT applications. A failure in the backup system can directly lead to element extrusion, even if the elastomer itself was appropriately selected for the pressure and temperature.

For dissolvable packers, a unique design challenge is the interaction between the rubber element and the dissolving components of the packer body.⁸⁸ The elastomer must not impede the dissolution process. For example, if the element swells significantly in the fluid that triggers the dissolution of the metallic or polymeric body, it could shield these components from the fluid, slowing down or preventing complete dissolution. This requires careful selection of both the elastomer and the dissolvable material to ensure chemical compatibility and predictable degradation of the packer assembly, leaving a clear wellbore.

Section 3: Failure Analysis of Packer Elements

Understanding the potential failure modes of rubber packer elements is crucial for enhancing their reliability, optimizing designs, and troubleshooting operational issues. Packer element failure can lead to loss of zonal isolation, compromised well integrity, and significant non-productive time (NPT). This section provides a comprehensive guide to common failure modes, their underlying causes, visual characteristics, and strategies for prevention and mitigation.

3.1. Catalog of Common Failure Modes

A systematic approach to failure analysis begins with the accurate identification of the failure mode based on the condition of the retrieved element and its operational history.

• Introduction to Packer Element Failure: Packer elements operate under severe conditions, and failures can arise from a combination of factors including material limitations, design deficiencies, incorrect application, or unexpected wellbore events. A thorough failure analysis aims to identify the root cause(s) to prevent recurrence.

For each common failure mode detailed below, the visual characteristics, typical root causes, and preventative/mitigation strategies are discussed.

Table 3.1.1: Packer Element Failure Mode Summary: Characteristics, Causes, and Prevention

This table serves as a critical diagnostic tool, allowing engineers to correlate visual evidence from a failed element with probable causes and established solutions, thereby streamlining the failure analysis process. When a packer is retrieved and its element shows signs of damage, this structured approach—drawing from a wide range of failure analysis knowledge ¹—provides the initial framework for investigation.

3.2. Specific Failure Modes to Analyze in Detail

A deeper understanding of the mechanisms behind common failure modes is essential for effective prevention.

Extrusion:

• Mechanism: Extrusion occurs when the applied differential pressure across the packer element generates stresses within the elastomer that exceed its yield strength in the unconfined regions, forcing the material to flow into any available clearance, typically the gap between the packer mandrel and the casing ID on the low-pressure side.¹
• Influencing Factors: The primary drivers are high differential pressure and a large extrusion gap. The elastomer’s hardness (or more accurately, its modulus) plays a key role; softer materials extrude more easily. Elevated temperatures reduce the elastomer’s hardness and modulus, exacerbating extrusion. The presence, material, and design of anti-extrusion backup rings are critical in mitigating this failure mode.¹
• Prevention: The most effective strategies include minimizing the extrusion gap through tighter machining tolerances on packer components and casing selection, using a harder (higher Shore A durometer) elastomer compound, and incorporating robust backup systems. Backup rings made from high-modulus polymers like PEEK, or metallic rings (often designed to be conformable or expandable), physically block the extrusion path.¹

Chemical Incompatibility/Degradation:

• Mechanisms: Downhole fluids can interact with elastomers in several ways:
  • Swelling: Absorption of fluid molecules into the polymer matrix, causing an increase in volume and often a decrease in hardness and mechanical strength.¹
  • Hardening/Embrittlement: Chemical reactions (e.g., excessive crosslinking, oxidation, or attack by specific agents like H₂S) can make the elastomer hard and brittle, reducing its ability to seal dynamically or conform to irregularities.
  • Softening/Loss of Strength: Chain scission (breaking of polymer chains) or degradation of the crosslink network can lead to a gummy consistency and loss of mechanical integrity.
  • Extraction: Leaching of plasticizers or other soluble compounding ingredients from the elastomer into the wellbore fluid, causing shrinkage and hardening.
  • Specific Fluid Effects:
    • H₂S (Sour Gas): Can attack unsaturated sites in some elastomers or react with certain crosslink types, leading to embrittlement and loss of elasticity.⁵⁷ Materials like HNBR, FKM, FFKM, and AFLAS are generally selected for sour service.
    • CO₂: Causes significant swelling in many elastomers and can act as a plasticizer, reducing strength. It also significantly increases the risk of RGD upon depressurization.⁵⁴
    • Oils and Solvents: The compatibility depends on the polarity of the elastomer and the fluid. Non-polar elastomers (like EPDM) swell significantly in hydrocarbon oils, while polar elastomers (like NBR) resist oils but may swell in polar solvents.¹
    • Amines and High pH Fluids: Can aggressively attack and degrade certain types of FKMs. AFLAS and specialized FFKM grades are often chosen for their superior resistance in such environments.¹
• Prevention: The cornerstone of preventing chemical degradation is the selection of an elastomer with proven compatibility with all anticipated wellbore fluids (including drilling muds, completion brines, treatment chemicals, and produced fluids) at the maximum service temperature. Comprehensive fluid compatibility testing, ideally with actual field fluids or close simulants, is crucial for critical applications.¹

Rapid Gas Decompression (RGD) / Explosive Decompression (ED):

• Mechanism Review: As detailed in Section 1.3, RGD involves gas absorption at high pressure and subsequent rapid internal expansion upon depressurization, leading to material rupture.⁵²
• Critical Parameters: The severity of RGD is influenced by gas type (CO₂ and H₂S are more problematic than CH₄ due to higher solubility/diffusivity), saturation pressure, system temperature, the rate of depressurization, the elastomer’s intrinsic gas permeability and mechanical properties (tear strength, modulus), and the element’s geometry (larger cross-sections are more vulnerable).⁵²
• Prevention: Selection of RGD-resistant materials, qualified to standards like NORSOK M-710 or ISO 23936-2, is paramount.¹ Optimizing element design to reduce cross-sectional area where feasible can also help. Operationally, controlling depressurization rates to allow gradual outgassing is beneficial but often not practical in emergency scenarios.

Compression Set:

• Mechanism: Compression set is the permanent deformation remaining in an elastomer after it has been subjected to prolonged compressive stress, particularly at elevated temperatures. It reflects the inability of the elastomer network to fully recover its original shape.¹ This occurs due to a combination of physical stress relaxation (viscoelastic flow of polymer chains) and irreversible chemical changes within the network, such as the formation of new, stable crosslinks in a deformed state or the scission of existing crosslinks. A high compression set leads to a loss of sealing force over time, potentially resulting in leakage.
• Influencing Factors: Elastomer type is a primary factor; FFKMs typically exhibit the lowest compression set, followed by peroxide-cured FKMs, HNBRs, and AFLAS. Sulfur-cured elastomers, especially those with high polysulfidic content, tend to have higher compression set. Temperature is a major accelerator of set. The duration of compression and the initial amount of squeeze (deformation) also play significant roles.¹
• Prevention: Use elastomers specifically formulated for low compression set. Peroxide cure systems are generally preferred over sulfur cures for HPHT applications requiring low set.¹ Design the packer element for an optimal initial squeeze—enough to seal effectively but not so excessive as to overstress the material and accelerate set. Operating within the elastomer’s recommended temperature limits is also crucial.

Abrasion and Wear:

• Mechanism: This involves the mechanical removal of material from the packer element surface due to friction against the casing or tubing during run-in, setting, or retrieval. It is more prevalent in deviated or rough wellbores, when moving past perforations, or if abrasive particles (sand, proppant, scale) are present in the wellbore fluids.¹
• Prevention: Select abrasion-resistant elastomer compounds (often those with good tear strength and higher hardness). Design elements with smooth profiles and chamfered or radiused edges to reduce snagging. Ensure the wellbore is as clean as practicable before running the packer. Careful handling during deployment and controlled run-in/retrieval speeds can also minimize wear.

Thermal Degradation:

• Mechanism: This refers to irreversible chemical changes in the elastomer’s polymer structure (e.g., chain scission, depolymerization, or excessive crosslinking) caused by exposure to temperatures exceeding its thermal stability limit. This is distinct from the reversible softening that occurs at elevated temperatures within the material’s normal operating range. Thermal degradation leads to a permanent loss of elasticity, hardening, embrittlement, and surface cracking.¹
• Prevention: The most straightforward prevention is to select an elastomer with a maximum continuous operating temperature rating that provides an adequate safety margin above the highest anticipated wellbore temperature. It’s important to differentiate between short-term temperature excursion limits and long-term continuous service temperatures when evaluating materials.

Improper Installation/Setting:

• Causes: Failures in this category are typically due to human error or equipment malfunction during packer deployment or setting. Examples include applying incorrect setting forces (too high or too low), over-torquing mechanical-set packers, setting the packer too quickly, using damaged or incorrect setting tools, or misalignment of the packer within the wellbore.¹
• Manifestations: Damage can include pinched or cut sections of the element, torn edges where the element interfaces with metallic components, uneven or localized over-compression leading to premature extrusion or splitting, and overall failure to achieve a proper seal.
• Prevention: Strict adherence to the packer manufacturer’s recommended installation and setting procedures is essential. This includes proper training of field personnel, use of calibrated and correctly maintained setting tools, ensuring correct packer-to-casing compatibility, and applying appropriate lubricants if specified.

It is important to recognize that many of these failure modes are not mutually exclusive and can be interconnected. For example, chemical degradation, such as fluid-induced swelling or hardening, can significantly reduce an elastomer’s resistance to extrusion or make it more susceptible to RGD.¹ Similarly, thermal degradation can accelerate the rate of compression set.⁹⁷ This synergistic interplay of degradation mechanisms means that a holistic approach is required for both material selection and failure diagnosis.

The service history of the packer element is also a critical factor. An element that has already undergone several pressure and temperature cycles, or has been exposed to various wellbore fluids over time, will have experienced some degree of “aging.” This accumulated damage or property change can significantly impact its susceptibility to failure during subsequent operations. An element that has already taken a substantial compression set, for instance, will be far more likely to leak during a later pressure cycle than a new element. This underscores the importance of considering the cumulative effects of the downhole environment and operational history in any failure analysis.¹⁰²

Furthermore, the performance of the packer element is intrinsically linked to the integrity of its supporting components, particularly the anti-extrusion backup system. Failure or improper design of backup rings can be a direct cause of element extrusion, even if the elastomer itself was correctly specified for the application.¹ If a PEEK backup ring cracks due to embrittlement at low temperature or if a metallic backup ring is too soft and deforms under load, it effectively increases the extrusion gap that the elastomer must bridge, leading to premature element failure. In such cases, the failure is of the entire sealing system, not just the rubber component.

A common pitfall in field diagnosis is focusing on the most obvious visual symptom without considering the sequence of events or underlying contributing factors that may be less apparent. For instance, an element might exhibit clear signs of extrusion, but the primary cause could have been chemical softening that severely weakened the material, making it susceptible to extrusion at pressures it would normally withstand. A robust diagnostic guide should prompt the engineer to look for multiple indicators and consider how different degradation mechanisms might interact.

The condition of the packer body, slips, anti-extrusion rings, and other metallic components retrieved alongside the element can also provide crucial clues. For example, deformed or damaged slips might indicate that excessive setting forces were applied, which could also have over-compressed or damaged the rubber element. Similarly, damaged or missing backup rings are a direct indicator of conditions conducive to element extrusion.

It is also vital to capture as much data and as many images as possible before and immediately during retrieval. The condition of an elastomer element can change once it is brought to the surface and exposed to atmospheric conditions, different temperatures, and handling. Photographs of the element in situ (if feasible via downhole camera technology) or immediately upon retrieval, along with detailed notes on any difficulties or forces encountered during the unsetting and retrieval process, provide the most accurate representation of its “as-failed” state and are invaluable for a comprehensive analysis. This practice aligns with standard forensic engineering principles, where preserving the evidence in its original state is paramount.

Conclusion

The reliable performance of rubber packer elements is fundamental to the success of a vast range of downhole operations in the oil and gas industry. This handbook has endeavored to provide a comprehensive engineering overview, addressing the critical aspects of materials science, application-specific design considerations, and failure analysis pertinent to these essential sealing components.

The selection of an appropriate elastomer is the cornerstone of packer element design. A thorough understanding of the chemical structure, mechanical properties, thermal and pressure limitations, and chemical compatibilities of common oilfield elastomers—including NBR, HNBR, FKM, FFKM, AFLAS®, and EPDM—is paramount. Each material offers a unique balance of performance characteristics and cost, and the optimal choice is invariably dictated by the specific conditions of the wellbore environment, including temperature, pressure, and the nature of the downhole fluids (H₂S, CO₂, hydrocarbons, brines, and various treatment chemicals). The decision-making process must also account for phenomena such as fluid-induced swell and shrinkage, changes in mechanical properties under operational stresses, and resistance to specialized failure modes like Rapid Gas Decompression (RGD). Furthermore, the inherent properties of base elastomers can be significantly enhanced through judicious compounding with fillers, plasticizers, appropriate cure systems (sulfur or peroxide), and protective agents like antioxidants and antiozonants. This formulation science allows for the tailoring of materials to meet increasingly stringent downhole demands.

The design of the rubber element itself is inextricably linked to the type of packer in which it is employed and its specific setting mechanism. Whether for permanent, hydraulic-set, mechanical-set, retrievable, wireline-set, or dissolvable packers, the element’s geometry, hardness, and interface with metallic components must be carefully engineered to ensure effective conversion of setting force into a durable annular seal. Factors such as expected service life, the need for anti-extrusion features, and retrieval considerations significantly influence these design choices.

Despite careful selection and design, packer elements can fail. A systematic approach to failure analysis, based on visual examination of the retrieved element and a thorough review of its operational history, is crucial for identifying root causes. Common failure modes such as extrusion, chemical degradation, RGD, compression set, abrasion, thermal degradation, and improper installation each have distinct characteristics and underlying causes. Understanding these allows for the implementation of effective prevention and mitigation strategies, ranging from material upgrades and design modifications to refined operational procedures.

Ultimately, ensuring the integrity and longevity of rubber packer elements in the demanding completion sector requires a holistic engineering approach. This involves not only a deep understanding of elastomer science and mechanics but also a keen appreciation for the complex interactions between the material, the packer design, the wellbore environment, and operational practices. Continuous advancements in material science, coupled with rigorous testing and diligent failure analysis, will remain key to meeting the evolving challenges of the oil and gas industry.

Works cited

1. REVERSE ENGINEERING OF RUBBER PRODUCTS.pdf
2. kpmrubber.com, accessed June 10, 2025, https://kpmrubber.com/nitrile-butadiene-rubber/#:~:text=Chemical%20Composition%20and%20Structure%20of%20NBR%3A&text=The%20varying%20ratios%20of%20these,flexibility%20and%20low%2Dtemperature%20performance.
3. NBR Seal and Gasket – What is Acrylonitrile Butadiene Rubber – Perbunan?, accessed June 10, 2025, https://kofler-dichtungen.at/en/sealing-knowledge/what-is-an-nbr-seal
4. HNBR vs. NBR: Understanding the Differences & Choosing the Right Material – R.E. Purvis, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.repurvis.com/articles/hnbr-vs-nbr-understanding-differences-choosing-right-material
5. Elastomers for PCP systems – PetroWiki – Society of Petroleum Engineers, accessed June 10, 2025, https://petrowiki.spe.org/Elastomers_for_PCP_systems
6. NBR O-Rings: Everything You Need to Know | Official Apple Rubber Blog, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.applerubber.com/blog/nbr-o-rings-everything-you-need-to-know/
7. Guidelines For Selecting Packer Elements and Seals: Section | PDF | Oil Well – Scribd, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/483867435/ST-Sec15
8. HNBR O-rings | Materials explained simply | Sealing Academy, accessed June 10, 2025, https://nh-oring.de/en/hnbr-o-rings-materials-simply-explained/
9. O-Ring Material Temperature Range Chart – Wyatt Seal, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.wyattseal.com/blog/selecting-o-rings-by-temperature
10. Sealing Elements – Technisch Handbook O-Rings, accessed June 10, 2025, https://o-ring.info/en/o-ring/brochures/08_eriks%20nv_o-ring_compound_selection_update_april_2013.pdf
11. NBR/HNBR – Ceetak, accessed June 10, 2025, https://ceetak.com/materials/nitrile-hydrogenated-nitrile/
12. Branched EHNBR and its properties with enhanced low-temperature performance and oil resistance – RSC Publishing, accessed June 10, 2025, https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2019/ra/c9ra03656c
13. HYDROGENATED NITRILE BUTADIENE RUBBER (HNBR), accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.georgelodgedirect.co.uk/downloads/ZZ00028643/HNBR%20DATA.pdf
14. HNBR’s Role in Advanced Sealing | Global O-Ring and Seal, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.globaloring.com/blog/hnbrs-role-in-advanced-sealing/
15. HNBR Sealing Compounds for Energy, Oil, & Gas Service, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.gallagherseals.com/blog/hnbr-sealing-compounds-for-energy-oil-gas-service
16. ELASTOMERS & ADVANCED THERMOPLASTIC REFERENCE GUIDE – Freudenberg Oil & Gas, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.ffltech.com/fileadmin/documents/FOGT_Materials_Guide_MECH_4-4-22.pdf
17. HNBR Seals Supplier – O-Rings – NewDealSeals, accessed June 10, 2025, https://newdealseals.com/en/our-products/o-rings/hnbr-o-rings/
18. en.wikipedia.org, accessed June 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FKM#:~:text=Type%2D2%20FKMs%20are%20composed,flexibility%20may%20be%20affected%20negatively.
19. FKM – Wikipedia, accessed June 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FKM
20. Understanding Fluoroelastomer (FKM & Viton™) Rubber – WARCO, accessed June 10, 2025, https://warco.com/understanding-fluoroelastomer-fkm-viton-rubber/
21. Packer Elements – Parker Hannifin, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.parker.com/content/dam/Parker-com/Literature/TechSeal-Division/Literature-PDF-Files/Parker_TechSeal_Packer_Elements_TSD_5430.pdf
22. O-RING designations | Materials Simply explained, accessed June 10, 2025, https://nh-oring.de/en/o-ring-designations-materials-simply-explained/
23. eriks.com, accessed June 10, 2025, https://eriks.com/en/what-we-do/rubber-materials-overview/ffkm/#:~:text=FFKM%2C%20also%20known%20as%20perfluorelastomer,highest%20level%20of%20chemical%20resistance.
24. trp.co.uk, accessed June 10, 2025, https://trp.co.uk/ffkm-hub/ffkm-o-ring-properties/#:~:text=An%20increase%20in%20fluorine%20content,properties%20required%20for%20effective%20sealing.
25. FFKM – ERIKs, accessed June 10, 2025, https://eriks.com/en/what-we-do/rubber-materials-overview/ffkm/
26. FFKM 78 datasheet – Advanced Sealing Technology, accessed June 10, 2025, https://advancedsealingtechnology.nl/app/uploads/2024/06/FFKM-78-datasheet.pdf
27. FFKM (perfluoroelastomer): A comprehensive guide to properties, applications and benefits, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.lindepolymer.com/ffkm-perfluoroelastomer-a-comprehensive-guide-to-properties-applications-and-benefits/
28. KALREZ-7075 – DuPont, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.dupont.com/products/kalrez-7075.html
29. Kalrez FFKM O-Rings – Gallagher Fluid Seals, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.gallagherseals.com/categories/o-rings/perfluoroelastomer-ffkm-o-rings.html
30. Kalrez® Spectrum™ 7075 – Materialdatacenter.com, accessed June 10, 2025, https://dupontadh.materialdatacenter.com/en/products/datasheet/SI/Kalrez%C2%AE%20Spectrum%E2%84%A2%207075
31. FFKM Kalrez 0090 O-Ring, Size 910, 0.755″ ID x 0.097″ CS – Gallagher Fluid Seals, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.gallagherseals.com/or-as-910-ffkm-kalrez-0090.html
32. Energy | Greene Tweed, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.gtweed.com/industries/energy/
33. Chemraz® FFKM Perfluoroelastomer – Greene Tweed, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.gtweed.com/materials/chemraz-ffkm/
34. Chemraz® 505 – Greene Tweed, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.gtweed.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/chemraz-505-ed-pb.pdf
35. Chemraz® 505 Sealing Solutions – Greene Tweed, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.gtweed.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/chemraz-505-en-tp.pdf
36. The Pressure Test: AFLAS® Under Extremes – Global O-Ring and Seal, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.globaloring.com/de/blog/the-pressure-test-aflas-under-extremes/
37. Aflas® O-Rings TFE/P Seals for Chemical and Steam Resistance – Marco Rubber & Plastics, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.marcorubber.com/aflas-o-rings.htm
38. Silicon, Fluorosilicon, Polyurethane, Styrene Butadiene Rubber, SBR Rubber, Mumbai, India, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.oringsindia.com/aflas.html
39. Aflas® | TFE/P – O-Ring.info, accessed June 10, 2025, https://o-ring.info/en/materials/aflas-tfep/
40. EPDM rubber – Wikipedia, accessed June 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPDM_rubber
41. www.lorric.com, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.lorric.com/en/Articles/Material/rubber/epdm-material-datasheet#:~:text=and%20physical%20properties-,Structure%20and%20Acid%2DAlkali%20Resistance,%2C%20ozone%2C%20and%20chemical%20corrosion.
42. EPDM Seals – Find Out More About Key Properties & Applications, accessed June 10, 2025, https://dpseals.com/materials/rubber-materials-expertise/epdm-seals/
43. What is EPDM rubber? | Essentra Components US, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.essentracomponents.com/en-us/news/solutions/general-protection/what-is-epdm-rubber
44. EPDM Rubber Compound: Properties, Formulation & Testing, accessed June 10, 2025, https://alttran.com/epdm-rubber-compound/
45. A Comprehensive Guide on Perfluoroelastomer FFKM O-Rings – Horiaki, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.horiaki.co.in/perfluoroelastomer-ffkm-o-rings-its-properties-and-applications.html
46. www.mdpi.com, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/11/8/1280#:~:text=Elastomers%20are%20susceptible%20to%20chemical,leads%20to%20limited%20operating%20time.
47. How Seals Combat HPHT – CDI Products, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.cdiproducts.com/blog/how-seals-combat-hpht
48. Glass transition – Wikipedia, accessed June 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass_transition
49. Glass Transition Temperature (Tg) of Polymers – Protolabs, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.protolabs.com/resources/design-tips/glass-transition-temperature-of-polymers/
50. The Defining Series: HPHT Wells – SLB, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.slb.com/resource-library/oilfield-review/defining-series/defining-hpht
51. Overview of API Standards activity on HPHT equipment – World Oil, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.worldoil.com/media/10312/overview-of-api-standards-activity-on-hpht-equipment-for-world-oil-2018.pdf
52. An introduction to Rapid Gas Decompression (RGD) – Valve World, accessed June 10, 2025, https://valve-world.net/an-introduction-to-rapid-gas-decompression-rgd/
53. Norsok M-710 Approved Materials – Trelleborg, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.trelleborg.com/seals/-/media/tss-media-repository/tss_website/pdf-and-other-literature/brochures/norsok_m710_approved_materials.pdf?rev=-1
54. Elastomers in CO2 – Seals Eastern, Inc., accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.sealseastern.com/PDF/Elastomers-in-CO2.pdf
55. Swelling of Elastomers in CO2 Environment: Testing Methodology and Experimental Data | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267458407_Swelling_of_Elastomers_in_CO2_Environment_Testing_Methodology_and_Experimental_Data
56. ISO23936-2 & NORSOK M710 Elastomers – Precision Polymer Engineering, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.prepol.com/industries/energy/iso23936-2-norsok-elastomers/
57. Elastomer Classification and Characterization – c-fer technologies, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.cfertech.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/RPElastomerCharacterisitics.pdf
58. Sour fluid resistant elastomers – Precision Polymer Engineering, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.prepol.com/solutions/sour-gas-resistant-elastomers/
59. On how CO2 partial pressure on corrosion of HNBR rubber O-ring in CO2–H2S–CH4 environment | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347981124_On_how_CO2_partial_pressure_on_corrosion_of_HNBR_rubber_O-ring_in_CO2-H2S-CH4_environment
60. Characterization and Analysis of Corrosion Resistance of Rubber Materials for Downhole Tools in a High-Stress Environment with Coupled H2S-CO2 – PMC, accessed June 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10890510/
61. How Does A Swellable Packer Work? – Rigzone, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.rigzone.com/training/insight?insight_id=353&c_id=24
62. Research Progress of Elastomer Materials and Application of Elastomers in Drilling Fluid, accessed June 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9959665/
63. Diffusion-based swelling in elastomers under low- and high-salinity brine – ResearchGate, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327556453_Diffusion-based_swelling_in_elastomers_under_low-_and_high-salinity_brine
64. WO2014158192A1 – Accelerated swelling of oil-swellable elastomers in a well – Google Patents, accessed June 10, 2025, https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2014158192A1/en
65. Chemical Resistance Chart – Elastomers | Phelps Industrial Products, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.phelpsgaskets.com/useful-resources/chemical-resistance-chart-elastomers
66. Peroxide or Sulphur cured EPDM – What does your application need? | Rocket Seals, Inc., accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.rocketseals.com/blog/2018/02/15/peroxide-or-sulphur-cured-epdm-what-does-your-application-need/
67. EPDM Coatings: Peroxide-Cured vs Sulfur-Cured and the Benefits – Gallagher Fluid Seals, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.gallagherseals.com/blog/coatings-peroxide-cured-vs-sulphur-cured
68. antioxidants and antiozonants – Akrochem Corporation, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.akrochem.com/pdf/technical_papers/antiox_antioz_part1.pdf
69. Antioxidants and Antiozonants role in manufacturing safe tires, accessed June 10, 2025, https://dtsc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2021/08/USTMA-DTSC-6PPD-Workshop_ADA-Compliant-7.26.2021.pdf
70. The Role of Fillers in Rubber Compounding, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.customrubbercorp.com/blog/September-2024/The-Role-of-Fillers-in-Rubber-Compounding
71. Packer | PDF – Scribd, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/484961303/Packer-doc
72. Development of Rubber Packing Element for 105 MPa/215 °C Deep-Well Test Packer – PMC, accessed June 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8954796/
73. Development of Rubber Packing Element for 105 MPa/215 °C Deep-Well Test Packer, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359132359_Development_of_Rubber_Packing_Element_for_105_MPa215_C_Deep-Well_Test_Packer
74. Hydraulic set Permanet Pkr – YouTube, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1ypD6iiySM
75. Niyantran (Control) Set Liner Hanger Animation – No Risk of Premature Setting – YouTube, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irYWLdN15a8
76. Extended Reach Retrievable Seal Bore Packer W/ Hydraulic Setting Tool (High Torque), accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1xZnSI2j6Y
77. E Hydraulic Set Packer – YouTube, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUUpEllN-v0
78. Hydraulic Set Packer – Drilling & Well Completion, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.tidjma.tn/en/glossary/o-g-hydraulic-set-packer-7632/
79. Packer element – JST-Seals, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.jst-seals.com/blog/packer-element_bk
80. MPas-e Remote Set Packer System – YouTube, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3U-D7B68yI
81. TechWest TechSet Mechanical Packer – YouTube, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JcpWtFCBM0
82. Setting Mechanisms for Types of Packer – Vigor – Perforating Gun, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.vigoroiltools.com/news/setting-mechanisms-for-types-of-packer/
83. Packer Setting Mechanism – DrillingForGas, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.drillingforgas.com/en/completion/operations/packer-setting-mechanism
84. Retrievable Packers – Silver Fox Completion Services, accessed June 10, 2025, https://silver-fox.net/wp-content/uploads/1.-RETRIEVABLE-PACKERS-v2201.pdf
85. China HNBR Rubber Packer Elements Manufacturers Suppliers Factory – linde polymer, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.lindeseals.com/packer-elements/hnbr-rubber-packer-elements.html
86. China AS1X Retrievable Packer Manufacturer and Supplier | Vigor – Perforating Gun, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.vigoroiltools.com/as1x-retrievable-packer-product/
87. Wireline-set Signature series packers – Baker Hughes, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.bakerhughes.com/completions/packers/permanent-production-packers/wirelineset-sealbore-packers/wirelineset-signature-series-packers
88. Why Dissolvable frac plugs Are Important in the Oil and Gas Industry – Vertechs Group, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.vertechs.com/news-detail/why-dissolvable-frac-plugs-are-important-in-the-oil&gas-industry
89. Dissolvable Frac Plugs : Simplifying and Accelerating O&G Production – Stratview Research, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.stratviewresearch.com/articles/Dissolvable-Frac-Plugs–Simplifying-and-Accelerating-OG-Production
90. Atlas Dissolvable Packer™ | Shale Oil Tools, accessed June 10, 2025, https://shaleoiltools.com/product/atlas-dissolvable-packer/
91. PACKER ELEMENTS — East Texas Seals Parker Distributor, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.easttexasseals.com/packer-elements
92. O-Ring Failure Modes: Extrusion Damage – Zatkoff Seals & Packings, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.zatkoff.com/news/o-ring-failure-modes-extrusion-damage
93. EXPERT KNOWLEDGE FAILURE ANALYSIS OF ELASTOMER COMPONENTS – O-Ring Prüflabor |, accessed June 10, 2025, https://o-ring-prueflabor.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/10_expert_knowledge-extrusion_.pdf
94. SPE-214487-MS Downhole Completion Challenges and Solution using Critical Nonmetallic Sealing Technologies – OnePetro, accessed June 10, 2025, https://onepetro.org/spesym/proceedings-pdf/23SYM/23SYM/D011S002R005/3335289/spe-214487-ms.pdf
95. ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION OF ELASTOMERIC ADHESIVES AND RUBBERS IN HYGROTHERMAL AND HYDROLYTIC AGING CONDITIONS – Digital Repository, accessed June 10, 2025, https://d.lib.msu.edu/etd/51615
96. Polymer Degradation royalty-free images – Shutterstock, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.shutterstock.com/search/polymer-degradation
97. O-Ring Failure Modes – Compression Set – Gallagher Fluid Seals, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.gallagherseals.com/blog/o-ring-failure-modes-compression-set
98. Compression Set Failure – Zatkoff Seals & Packings, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.zatkoff.com/compressionsetfailure
99. Understanding Compression Set in Rubber Seals – Seals Direct, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.sealsdirect.co.uk/blog/news-5/understanding-compression-set-in-rubber-seals-75
100. Packer Cups – Global Elastomeric Products, Inc., accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.globaleee.com/products/packer-cups/
101. Hydraulic Packer Testing in Boreholes – Legion Drilling, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.legiondrilling.com.au/drilling-stories/packer-testing-for-geotechnical-and-hydrogeological-applicaitons
102. ESP Failure Nomenclature – c-fer technologies, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.cfertech.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/ESPFailureNomenclature.Ver4_.4.pdf
103. 12 Extrusion Defects and Troubleshooting – Elastron, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.elastron.com/blog/12-extrusion-defects-and-troubleshooting/
104. Packer failure | PPT – SlideShare, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/packer-failure-62952804/62952804